Skip to main content

Turning a New Leaf?


Since 1965, a Forrest Code has protected the Amazon Rainforest. Simply put, this law enforces landowners to keep 35-80% of their land covered in native species. In 2012 a revised Forest Code was passed, which reversed years of progress to protect and sustain the land, even though deforestation has lowered significantly since the implementation of the forest code. As of February 28, 2018, Brazilian lawmakers have decided to uphold changes made in 2012 that cut protection of the Amazon Rainforest.
 
This graph shows the recent record of deforestation. It was at an all time low in 2011, just before the revised Forest Code was passed. (Taken from Mongabay.com)
The revision of the Forest Code came about by those who push an agricultural agenda. Under this revision, there is lessened forest protection, more government and state control, farmers are allowed to cultivate land that is vulnerable to erosion, and will alleviate landholders from legal penalties who have previously illegally deforested in the past. Additionally, those who previously logged the area no longer have to replant the vegetation they would have had to under the original law. People are saying that, since the Brazilian government is upholding these changes to the law, they are essentially encouraging illegal deforestation and destruction of the forest. The repercussions of deforesting the Amazon could be devastating. The Amazon Rainforest is the largest on the planet, spreading 2.1 million square miles into 9 different countries. It is home to thousands of native plants, unique animals, and millions of insects. Not only that, but it also produces about 20% of the world’s oxygen supply. Without this forest, animals would lose their homes, endangered plant would be lost, there would be less oxygen available, and we would be facing rapid global warming.

This is what the beautiful Amazon Rainforest should look like, green, leafy, and prosperous, in all locations. (image borrowed from google)

Cattle casually graze the land, as the forest smolders in the background. (borrowed from greenpeace USA)

Historically, as well as currently, agriculture and ranching has been very important to Brazil’s culture and economy. The country’s most significant agricultural products include coffee, soybean, beef, corn, sugarcane, and cocoa. In 2016, Agriculture alone accounted for 5.45% of Brazil’s Gross Domestic Profit. Because beef is of high importance, the large amount of resources such as water, land, and food, which cattle farmers need, is also of high importance. Farmers, then, do whatever it takes, including deforesting, to feed their cattle so they can in turn feed their families (subsistence farming), or make a living (commercial farming). One reason Brazil minimized the restrictions of the original forest code is to improve the agricultural sector of their economy. Farmers will be able to work more land and raise more cattle, which will hopefully produce more income for the country.

This news makes me sad. Deforestation could negatively impact every living being, as well as affect our planet. The Amazon accounts for half of the world’s total rainforests, produces a significant amount of the oxygen we breathe, and is responsible for housing many of our plants, animals, and some native tribes. If too much of the forest is eliminated, our world would be put in a dangerous place. I hope the citizens of Brazil continue to care for and maintain their land, even though they no longer have as strict of laws protecting it.
The Amazon accounts for half of the world's remaining rainforests. Without it, we will be facing a dangerous future. (borrowed from Scholastic)
Links:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kasey Knutson: An Introduction

Hello, blog-readers! My name is Kasey Knutson, and my hometown is Alden, MN. I am a Junior Elementary Education Major, with a Communication Studies Minor. I am attending Southern Utah University through the National Student Exchange program, so my home university is actually the University of South Dakota. This is Donald Easton-Brooks, the Dean of USD's School of Education, and me at the Kappa Delta Pi Educational Honor Society initiation during the fall semester. I was one of only 30 members who were inducted. Recently I have gotten into running distance races. My first official run was a 10-mile race in April of 2017. After that, in July, I split a half-marathon with my sister. To finish the year out, I completed a full half-marathon at the end of October. Each race had its own difficulty, but I enjoyed the challenges of them all. There is not a better feeling than completing a race (and not finishing last)! "Goldy's 10" was the first race I completed ...

Sometimes Bigger is NOT Better

On the 16 th of November in 2017, the Keystone Pipeline spilled what was initially reported to be 210,000 gallons of crude oil onto the farmlands of Aberdeen, South Dakota. Nearly doubling the initial amount, it actually dumped 407,000 gallons as of April 7, 2018, costing TransCanada (the owners) $9.57 million. The Keystone is a pipeline that carries crude oil more than 2,500 miles from Alberta, Canada to Illinois and Texas. In the past eight years, this has been the seventh largest onshore spill of an oil or petroleum product. Try this on for size- 407,000 gallons of crude oil spilled across the farmlands of Aberdeen, SD. (borrowed from globalnews.ca) Early on November 16 th , a TransCanada employee detected a pressure drop, and no more than three minuets later they began to shut down the line. The leak is thought to have occurred due to mechanical damage regarding the weights that are installed on the pipeline to prevent the line from floating in areas that a...